Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The case involves supply of goods to power projects through international competitive biddings without duty payment. Appellant faced denial of exemption u/s N/N. 6/2006-CE. Goods were cleared under Central Excise Tariff Sub-headings 8413 and 8431, while exemption applied to Customs Sub-heading 9801. CESTAT held that appellant, as per precedent [2023 (7) TMI 298 - CESTAT KOLKATA], is entitled to N/N. 6/2006-CE benefit. Impugned order denying exemption was set aside, and appeal allowed.
The case involves supply of goods to power projects through international competitive biddings without duty payment. Appellant faced denial of exemption u/s N/N. 6/2006-CE. Goods were cleared under Central Excise Tariff Sub-headings 8413 and 8431, while exemption applied to Customs Sub-heading 9801. CESTAT held that appellant, as per precedent [2023 (7) TMI 298 - CESTAT KOLKATA], is entitled to N/N. 6/2006-CE benefit. Impugned order denying exemption was set aside, and appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
