Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
CESTAT NEW DELHI upheld the clubbing of consignments imported by Banke Bihari and Zippo Mobiles to avoid anti-dumping duty. Banke Bihari imported calculator parts to assemble them, triggering duty liability u/s 28(4) & 28(8) of Customs Act. Undervaluation of DVB remotes and diodes was confirmed, applying rule 12 of Valuation Rules. Differential duty was imposed due to undervaluation. Goods were confiscated u/s 111(m) and penalties imposed u/s 112 & 114A for misclassification and submitting false invoices. Appeals were dismissed, affirming the Principal Commissioner's decisions.