Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The case involves attachment of immovable property jointly owned by appellant and brothers for government dues recovery. The attachment was done u/r 2(vi) of Rules of 1995 u/s 156 r/w. 142 of Customs Act, 1962. The property share is 20% appellant's and 80% brothers'. As partnership firm liability is joint u/s 25 of Indian Partnership Act, attaching entire property for firm's dues is improper. Interest u/s 11AB of Central Excise Act, 1944 not applicable pre-enactment. As dues paid, property attachment set aside, appeal allowed.
The case involves attachment of immovable property jointly owned by appellant and brothers for government dues recovery. The attachment was done u/r 2(vi) of Rules of 1995 u/s 156 r/w. 142 of Customs Act, 1962. The property share is 20% appellant's and 80% brothers'. As partnership firm liability is joint u/s 25 of Indian Partnership Act, attaching entire property for firm's dues is improper. Interest u/s 11AB of Central Excise Act, 1944 not applicable pre-enactment. As dues paid, property attachment set aside, appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
