Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Demand of differential Central Excise Duty with interest and penalty - inflating freight charges through their dummy transport unit - The Tribunal affirmed the confirmation of the differential duty, penalties, and interest imposed by the Assistant Commissioner, based on the findings of undervaluation and evasion of excise duty. Regarding the determination of assessable value, the Tribunal analyzed the provisions of Rule 5 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules and Section 4(1)(a) of the Act. However, it found no merit in the appellant's argument and upheld the impugned orders.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
