Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Process amounting to manufacture or not - Process of separating foot oil, pressed wax, and paraffin wax from slack wax and residue wax - tilting, separating and pressing with hydraulic press - The Tribunal analyzed the process undertaken by the respondent, involving manual turning of drums, pouring contents onto gunny cloth for natural pressure, and using a hydraulic press for expediting the straining process. They observed that no machinery was used for separation, and the process did not result in new products. - They noted that the separated products retained the same characteristics as the original wax, as per technical literature and legal precedents. Therefore, the Tribunal held that the activities did not meet the definition of "manufacture" under the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Process amounting to manufacture or not - Process of separating foot oil, pressed wax, and paraffin wax from slack wax and residue wax - tilting, separating and pressing with hydraulic press - The Tribunal analyzed the process undertaken by the respondent, involving manual turning of drums, pouring contents onto gunny cloth for natural pressure, and using a hydraulic press for expediting the straining process. They observed that no machinery was used for separation, and the process did not result in new products. - They noted that the separated products retained the same characteristics as the original wax, as per technical literature and legal precedents. Therefore, the Tribunal held that the activities did not meet the definition of "manufacture" under the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
