Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Penalty u/r 26(1) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - charge of abating the evasion of duty by the Main Party - The appellant argued that since the main party's case of duty evasion had been settled under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme, 2019, they should not be penalized. The Tribunal agreed with this argument, citing legal precedents that supported setting aside penalties on co-noticees once the main case is resolved. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the penalty and allowed the appeal.
Penalty u/r 26(1) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - charge of abating the evasion of duty by the Main Party - The appellant argued that since the main party's case of duty evasion had been settled under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme, 2019, they should not be penalized. The Tribunal agreed with this argument, citing legal precedents that supported setting aside penalties on co-noticees once the main case is resolved. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the penalty and allowed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
