Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
TDS u/s 194H - assessee is a cellular mobile service providers - Aligning with the Supreme Court's judgment, the Gujarat High Court ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the discounts given to distributors are not commissions and that the relationship between the parties is of principal to principal. Consequently, the appellant is not required to deduct tax at source under Section 194H of the Income Tax Act concerning the discounts offered to distributors.
TDS u/s 194H - assessee is a cellular mobile service providers - Aligning with the Supreme Court's judgment, the Gujarat High Court ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the discounts given to distributors are not commissions and that the relationship between the parties is of principal to principal. Consequently, the appellant is not required to deduct tax at source under Section 194H of the Income Tax Act concerning the discounts offered to distributors.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.