Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Revision u/s 263 - Additions u/s 69 r.w.s. 115BBE - excess stock found during the course of survey as admitted to be the undisclosed business income of the assessee, by the main partner in the assessee firm - The ITAT found that since the department did not find other sources of income during the survey, it was reasonable to treat the excess stock as business income. Therefore, the AO's decision was not erroneous, and the invocation of revision powers under Section 263 - The Tribunal observed that the excess stock was not separately identifiable and was part of a mixed lot found during the survey. Considering precedents and the nature of the excess stock, it was deemed to be the business income of the assessee. Therefore, the AO's decision to tax it as business income was upheld.
Revision u/s 263 - Additions u/s 69 r.w.s. 115BBE - excess stock found during the course of survey as admitted to be the undisclosed business income of the assessee, by the main partner in the assessee firm - The ITAT found that since the department did not find other sources of income during the survey, it was reasonable to treat the excess stock as business income. Therefore, the AO's decision was not erroneous, and the invocation of revision powers under Section 263 - The Tribunal observed that the excess stock was not separately identifiable and was part of a mixed lot found during the survey. Considering precedents and the nature of the excess stock, it was deemed to be the business income of the assessee. Therefore, the AO's decision to tax it as business income was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
