Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Validity of reopening of assessment - The High court observed that the reasons for reopening did not specifically allege any failure on the part of the petitioner to disclose all material facts. Moreover, the issues raised were already considered during the original assessment proceedings. Therefore, the reopening based on a change of opinion was not justified.
Validity of reopening of assessment - The High court observed that the reasons for reopening did not specifically allege any failure on the part of the petitioner to disclose all material facts. Moreover, the issues raised were already considered during the original assessment proceedings. Therefore, the reopening based on a change of opinion was not justified.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.