Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
Insolvency and BankruptcyApril 13, 2024Case LawsAT
Admission of petition under Section 7 of the IBC - initiation of CIRP - Corporate Guarantor - The Tribunal dismissed the claims of forgery, noting the lack of substantial evidence or any legal finding to the contrary. They emphasized the need for allegations of forgery to be established in a competent court, which had not occurred in this instance. - The Tribunal clarified that even past consideration (actions or agreements made before the execution of the guarantee) is sufficient under the law to validate a contract of guarantee. This addressed the concern about the timing of the deeds' execution relative to the disbursement of loans. - Allegations regarding the forged mortgage deeds were similarly set aside.
Admission of petition under Section 7 of the IBC - initiation of CIRP - Corporate Guarantor - The Tribunal dismissed the claims of forgery, noting the lack of substantial evidence or any legal finding to the contrary. They emphasized the need for allegations of forgery to be established in a competent court, which had not occurred in this instance. - The Tribunal clarified that even past consideration (actions or agreements made before the execution of the guarantee) is sufficient under the law to validate a contract of guarantee. This addressed the concern about the timing of the deeds' execution relative to the disbursement of loans. - Allegations regarding the forged mortgage deeds were similarly set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
