Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Income deemed to accrue or arise in India - receipts of subscription fees - The ITAT had found that it did not involve the transfer of copyright or the provision of technical or consultancy services that make available technical knowledge or processes to the subscriber. - The High court agreed with the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing that the provision of access to a legal database does not constitute the rendering of any technical or consultancy service that would make technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how, or processes available to the subscriber, thereby not falling within the ambit of FTS as defined by the relevant DTAA and the Act.
Income deemed to accrue or arise in India - receipts of subscription fees - The ITAT had found that it did not involve the transfer of copyright or the provision of technical or consultancy services that make available technical knowledge or processes to the subscriber. - The High court agreed with the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing that the provision of access to a legal database does not constitute the rendering of any technical or consultancy service that would make technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how, or processes available to the subscriber, thereby not falling within the ambit of FTS as defined by the relevant DTAA and the Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
