Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Vicarious liability for dishonoured company cheques may extend to non-signatory directors where complaints contain foundational responsibility avermen...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
321 to 340 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Income from other sources u/s 56 (2) (x) - purchased the property - difference between the valuation adopted by the district valuation officer and actual consideration - While the appellant asserts the necessity of establishing "on money" payments to warrant taxation under the Act, the tribunal maintains that the absence of such evidence does not preclude the application of anti-avoidance provisions. - The tribunal upholds the decision of the CIT(A) to confirm the addition u/s 56(2)(x)(b), holding the appellant liable for the additional tax resulting from the disputed property valuation.
Income from other sources u/s 56 (2) (x) - purchased the property - difference between the valuation adopted by the district valuation officer and actual consideration - While the appellant asserts the necessity of establishing "on money" payments to warrant taxation under the Act, the tribunal maintains that the absence of such evidence does not preclude the application of anti-avoidance provisions. - The tribunal upholds the decision of the CIT(A) to confirm the addition u/s 56(2)(x)(b), holding the appellant liable for the additional tax resulting from the disputed property valuation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.