Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Disallowance of deduction u/s 80IA(4)(i) - The tribunal noted the distinction between a developer (who assumes significant risks and responsibilities for the project) and a contractor (who does not assume such risks and is only responsible for executing work as per the contract) - The tribunal directed that, based on the nature of contracts and risks assumed, the assessee's claim for deductions under Section 80IA(4) should be allowed, emphasizing the role of the assessee as a developer rather than a mere contractor.
Disallowance of deduction u/s 80IA(4)(i) - The tribunal noted the distinction between a developer (who assumes significant risks and responsibilities for the project) and a contractor (who does not assume such risks and is only responsible for executing work as per the contract) - The tribunal directed that, based on the nature of contracts and risks assumed, the assessee's claim for deductions under Section 80IA(4) should be allowed, emphasizing the role of the assessee as a developer rather than a mere contractor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
