Appellate jurisdiction over baggage imports is excluded, requiring confiscation challenges involving passenger-carried gold to proceed by statutory re...
Article 227 review permits intervention in arbitration only for manifest, patent inherent jurisdictional defects, not representational authority dispu...
Valuation - Enhancement of value of the imported RPO - CESTAT held that, in the present case neither any contemporaneous value was adopted nor any method as prescribed u/s 14 read with Custom Valuation Rules, 2007 was followed. Therefore, merely on the basis of statements of director valuation cannot be enhanced. - Further regarding the Mis-declaration of Country of Origin in the bills of entry, the Tribunal held that, if there is a mis-declaration of country of origin the appellant being not the party to make any incorrect declaration cannot be held responsible and no consequential penalty can be imposed on the appellant.
Valuation - Enhancement of value of the imported RPO - CESTAT held that, in the present case neither any contemporaneous value was adopted nor any method as prescribed u/s 14 read with Custom Valuation Rules, 2007 was followed. Therefore, merely on the basis of statements of director valuation cannot be enhanced. - Further regarding the Mis-declaration of Country of Origin in the bills of entry, the Tribunal held that, if there is a mis-declaration of country of origin the appellant being not the party to make any incorrect declaration cannot be held responsible and no consequential penalty can be imposed on the appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
