Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Treating intimation u/s “143(1) as "non-est" - The onus is on the Revenue to show that the claim of TDS is fraudulent. A perusal of the computation sheet shows that inadvertently the assessee has mentioned the tax payable at normal rates at Sl. No. 3 instead of tax payable of deemed total income u/s 115JB of the Act. - This by any stretch of imagination, cannot be considered as fraudulent activity of the assessee to deny the benefit of the decision of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court of Delhi - AT
Treating intimation u/s “143(1) as "non-est" - The onus is on the Revenue to show that the claim of TDS is fraudulent. A perusal of the computation sheet shows that inadvertently the assessee has mentioned the tax payable at normal rates at Sl. No. 3 instead of tax payable of deemed total income u/s 115JB of the Act. - This by any stretch of imagination, cannot be considered as fraudulent activity of the assessee to deny the benefit of the decision of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court of Delhi - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
