Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - period of limitation - In fact, the impugned order dated July 28, 2022 of the Authorities had set out the entirety of the response of the appellant dated June 5, 2022 in its body and arrived at the finding that, the reply given was not tenable. The impugned order has also ascribed reasons why the reply of the appellant was not found to be tenable. - The impugned order of the authorities under Section 148A (d) of the Act of 1961 cannot be said to be vitiated by breach of principles of natural justice. - HC
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - period of limitation - In fact, the impugned order dated July 28, 2022 of the Authorities had set out the entirety of the response of the appellant dated June 5, 2022 in its body and arrived at the finding that, the reply given was not tenable. The impugned order has also ascribed reasons why the reply of the appellant was not found to be tenable. - The impugned order of the authorities under Section 148A (d) of the Act of 1961 cannot be said to be vitiated by breach of principles of natural justice. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
