Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Demand of differential service tax - Provider of GTA service - Whether the recipient of services were liable to pay ST on reverse charge basis (RCM) - all the service recipient are body corporate, dealer of excisable goods, registered factory, a partnership firm which are covered under exemption notification, whereby the service recipient is liable to pay service tax. Therefore, the assumption of the adjudicating authority is absolutely incorrect without any basis. - Demand set aside - AT
Demand of differential service tax - Provider of GTA service - Whether the recipient of services were liable to pay ST on reverse charge basis (RCM) - all the service recipient are body corporate, dealer of excisable goods, registered factory, a partnership firm which are covered under exemption notification, whereby the service recipient is liable to pay service tax. Therefore, the assumption of the adjudicating authority is absolutely incorrect without any basis. - Demand set aside - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.