Omitted specified domestic transaction provision invalidates related-party expenditure transfer-pricing references and assessments based on consequent...
Preventive suspension requires an immediate continuing threat and cannot become indefinite without inquiry, fresh evidence, or proportionate safeguard...
Dishonour of Cheque - Evidently, the petitioner cannot be allowed to be prosecuted for bald allegations, burden to prove whereof is on respondent No. 2 in view of admission of respondent No. 2 that he had signed the cheque which got dishonoured - Likewise, respondent No. 2 has admittedly acted in violation of mandate of The Income Tax Act - If the impugned FIR and proceedings arising out of the same is allowed to be sustained, it would amount in protecting and recognizing illegal acts of respondent No. 2. - HC
Dishonour of Cheque - Evidently, the petitioner cannot be allowed to be prosecuted for bald allegations, burden to prove whereof is on respondent No. 2 in view of admission of respondent No. 2 that he had signed the cheque which got dishonoured - Likewise, respondent No. 2 has admittedly acted in violation of mandate of The Income Tax Act - If the impugned FIR and proceedings arising out of the same is allowed to be sustained, it would amount in protecting and recognizing illegal acts of respondent No. 2. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
