Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
401 to 420 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Claim of exemption u/s. 10(22) and section 10(23C)(vi) - The respondents have not substantiated their bald statement that ASB/the petitioners have not invested the surplus money in accordance with law which in any event would not be a criteria at the initial stage of approval as held by the Apex Court in New Noble Society (supra). - Benefit of exemption allowed - HC
Claim of exemption u/s. 10(22) and section 10(23C)(vi) - The respondents have not substantiated their bald statement that ASB/the petitioners have not invested the surplus money in accordance with law which in any event would not be a criteria at the initial stage of approval as held by the Apex Court in New Noble Society (supra). - Benefit of exemption allowed - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
