Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Jurisdiction of Court to entertain the writ petition - The Petitioners have specifically averred that the Petitioner No.1 would be able to trade with the shares in Mumbai and therefore, impugned order of ROC has affected Petitioners’ rights in Mumbai. The said averments have remained uncontroverted. Thus, it is clear that the consequence of the impugned order fell on the Petitioner at Mumbai where atleast the cause of the action in part has taken place - HC
Jurisdiction of Court to entertain the writ petition - The Petitioners have specifically averred that the Petitioner No.1 would be able to trade with the shares in Mumbai and therefore, impugned order of ROC has affected Petitioners’ rights in Mumbai. The said averments have remained uncontroverted. Thus, it is clear that the consequence of the impugned order fell on the Petitioner at Mumbai where atleast the cause of the action in part has taken place - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
