Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Unsecured loan u/s 68 - Bogus cash credits - where there is a statutory rebuttable presumption against the assessee, as in case of cash credits etc., u/s 68 or unexplained investment u/s 69, the initial burden of proof is on the assessee to show that the cash credit is genuine or the investment is not unexplained. The AO should, therefore, always examine as to who has to discharge the burden of proof. - AT
Unsecured loan u/s 68 - Bogus cash credits - where there is a statutory rebuttable presumption against the assessee, as in case of cash credits etc., u/s 68 or unexplained investment u/s 69, the initial burden of proof is on the assessee to show that the cash credit is genuine or the investment is not unexplained. The AO should, therefore, always examine as to who has to discharge the burden of proof. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
