Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Disallowance u/s 40A(3) - Payment of expenditure in Cash exceeding ₹ 20,000 - whether payment would fall under Rule 6DD(k) of I.T. Rules? - we find force in the contention of the assessee that the alleged amount was not paid in cash by the assessee but was paid by the driver acting as an agent of the assessee. - the disallowance made by the AO is not sustainable - AT
Disallowance u/s 40A(3) - Payment of expenditure in Cash exceeding ₹ 20,000 - whether payment would fall under Rule 6DD(k) of I.T. Rules? - we find force in the contention of the assessee that the alleged amount was not paid in cash by the assessee but was paid by the driver acting as an agent of the assessee. - the disallowance made by the AO is not sustainable - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
