Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Insolvency and BankruptcyFebruary 28, 2022Case LawsAT
Applicant/Petitioner had sought a direction to be issued to the ‘Liquidator to convene the Meeting of the Creditors (inclusive of all the Creditors i.e., “Respondent No. 2) and place before them the ‘Scheme of Compromise/Settlement’ for their consideration’, this ‘Tribunal’ taking note of the fact that if the Promoter is ineligible under Section 29A of I & B Code, 2016 cannot make an Application for ‘Compromise and Arrangement’ for taking the immovable property and actionable claim of the ‘Corporate Debtor’ - AT
Applicant/Petitioner had sought a direction to be issued to the ‘Liquidator to convene the Meeting of the Creditors (inclusive of all the Creditors i.e., “Respondent No. 2) and place before them the ‘Scheme of Compromise/Settlement’ for their consideration’, this ‘Tribunal’ taking note of the fact that if the Promoter is ineligible under Section 29A of I & B Code, 2016 cannot make an Application for ‘Compromise and Arrangement’ for taking the immovable property and actionable claim of the ‘Corporate Debtor’ - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
