Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Claims of amount paid for employees taken on Secondment - Revenue attribution - AO on one hand had held the secondment agreement to be not a genuine agreement but on the other hand had disallowed only 50% of the expenditure which according to us appear to be contrary. We further find that CIT(A) for the reasons stated in the order has deleted the addition. Before us, Revenue has not pointed any fallacy in the findings of CIT(A) - No additions - AT
Claims of amount paid for employees taken on Secondment - Revenue attribution - AO on one hand had held the secondment agreement to be not a genuine agreement but on the other hand had disallowed only 50% of the expenditure which according to us appear to be contrary. We further find that CIT(A) for the reasons stated in the order has deleted the addition. Before us, Revenue has not pointed any fallacy in the findings of CIT(A) - No additions - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
