Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Refusal to direct stay - When a litigant has a right to prefer a second appeal against an order passed by the first appellate authority, it would be wholly unjust to say that he would have no right to seek suspension of collection of the remaining tax in dispute pending such appeal in appropriate cases where a strong arguable case is made out in his favour. - The petitioner has made out a strong arguable case in appeal - Stay granted from the collection of the remainder of the disputed tax - HC
Refusal to direct stay - When a litigant has a right to prefer a second appeal against an order passed by the first appellate authority, it would be wholly unjust to say that he would have no right to seek suspension of collection of the remaining tax in dispute pending such appeal in appropriate cases where a strong arguable case is made out in his favour. - The petitioner has made out a strong arguable case in appeal - Stay granted from the collection of the remainder of the disputed tax - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
