Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Rectification u/s 154 - Period of limitation as per section 154(7) - In the present case, the order u/s. 143(3) was passed on 26/12/2011 and the financial year is FY 2010-11. The impugned order passed dated 30/11/2018 is certainly beyond four years thereof. Hence, in our considered opinion, the assessee succeeds on the additional ground. The rectification order passed u/s. 154 in this case is accordingly time barred and hence, the same is squashed as such - AT
Rectification u/s 154 - Period of limitation as per section 154(7) - In the present case, the order u/s. 143(3) was passed on 26/12/2011 and the financial year is FY 2010-11. The impugned order passed dated 30/11/2018 is certainly beyond four years thereof. Hence, in our considered opinion, the assessee succeeds on the additional ground. The rectification order passed u/s. 154 in this case is accordingly time barred and hence, the same is squashed as such - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.