Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Authority to undertake a review contemplated under Section 67(5) of Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax, 2005 - since the regular Chairman of the Tribunal is not functioning, the petitioner has no other go except filing a review petition before ACAR. - the petitioner shall withdraw the appeal pending before the VAT Tribunal and then only proceed with the review petition - the 2nd respondent is directed to consider the review petition dated 14.12.2020 filed by the petitioner and afford personal hearing to the petitioner and pass appropriate orders - HC
Authority to undertake a review contemplated under Section 67(5) of Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax, 2005 - since the regular Chairman of the Tribunal is not functioning, the petitioner has no other go except filing a review petition before ACAR. - the petitioner shall withdraw the appeal pending before the VAT Tribunal and then only proceed with the review petition - the 2nd respondent is directed to consider the review petition dated 14.12.2020 filed by the petitioner and afford personal hearing to the petitioner and pass appropriate orders - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.