Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Validity of revision jurisdiction u/s. 263 - It is not in dispute that the borrowings and interest free advances to IHCL were made in earlier years and not during the year under consideration. In earlier orders we find that the borrowings made by the assessee and its utilisation thereof by way of interest free advance to IHCL has been accepted by the Revenue in scrutiny assessment proceedings, as meant for business purposes. - the reliance placed by the ld. PCIT on the provisions of Explanation-2 to Section 263 of the Act would not be relevant at all for the purpose of adjudication. - AT
Validity of revision jurisdiction u/s. 263 - It is not in dispute that the borrowings and interest free advances to IHCL were made in earlier years and not during the year under consideration. In earlier orders we find that the borrowings made by the assessee and its utilisation thereof by way of interest free advance to IHCL has been accepted by the Revenue in scrutiny assessment proceedings, as meant for business purposes. - the reliance placed by the ld. PCIT on the provisions of Explanation-2 to Section 263 of the Act would not be relevant at all for the purpose of adjudication. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.