Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Business expenditure u/s 37(1) - when a payment by way of impost or by way of penalty or interest is purely compensatory and not penal in nature, the same should be allowed as expenditure u/s 37(1) - A payment of compensation for breach of contract can by no stretch of imagination be termed as penalty for infraction of law
Business expenditure u/s 37(1) - when a payment by way of impost or by way of penalty or interest is purely compensatory and not penal in nature, the same should be allowed as expenditure u/s 37(1) - A payment of compensation for breach of contract can by no stretch of imagination be termed as penalty for infraction of law
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
