Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Power of commissioner to remand back the matter - As regards the ruling of Hon'ble Apex Court in MIL India Ltd. (2007 (3) TMI 8 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA), the Hon'ble High Court observed that the Ruling is not applicable to Service Tax matters as sub-Section (5) of Section 85 of Finance Act, 1994 starts with words “subject to the provisions of this chapter” - AT
Power of commissioner to remand back the matter - As regards the ruling of Hon'ble Apex Court in MIL India Ltd. (2007 (3) TMI 8 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA), the Hon'ble High Court observed that the Ruling is not applicable to Service Tax matters as sub-Section (5) of Section 85 of Finance Act, 1994 starts with words “subject to the provisions of this chapter” - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.