Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Expenditure on an abandoned towel-manufacturing expansion within an existing textile business was deductible as revenue expenditure because no completed capital asset or enduring advantage arose. Its initial classification as capital work-in-progress did not determine its character, which depended on its purpose and business context. The matching principle could not restrict a statutory deduction or compel spreading of expenditure; it applies only where the taxpayer elects to spread costs and the relevant conditions are met. The write-off was allowable in the relevant year, and the disallowance was deleted.
Expenditure on an abandoned towel-manufacturing expansion within an existing textile business was deductible as revenue expenditure because no completed capital asset or enduring advantage arose. Its initial classification as capital work-in-progress did not determine its character, which depended on its purpose and business context. The matching principle could not restrict a statutory deduction or compel spreading of expenditure; it applies only where the taxpayer elects to spread costs and the relevant conditions are met. The write-off was allowable in the relevant year, and the disallowance was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
