Charitable registration turns on predominant purpose and genuine activities, while incidental fees and related-party rent require supporting adverse m...
MAT book-profit adjustments exclude disallowances for exempt-income expenditure and demerger expenditure unless expressly listed under the statutory c...
Omitted specified domestic transaction provision invalidates related-party expenditure transfer-pricing references and assessments based on consequent...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Customs valuation of imported polyurethane-coated polyester...
Customs valuation must use comparable contemporary imports, while confiscation fines and penalties require proportionate recalculation on reassessed value.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Customs valuation of imported polyurethane-coated polyester water-resistant fabrics must be redetermined under the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007 using comparable contemporary imports rather than an internal departmental instruction or the highest available comparable value. Bills of Entry submitted by the importer should be considered, with the lowest value of similar contemporary imports forming the basis for reassessment. Excess quantity and minor declaration variations may render goods liable to confiscation, even where thickness variations fall within the declared GSM range and no intent to evade duty is established. Redemption fine and penalty must remain proportionate to the importer's involvement and be recalculated by reference to the redetermined value.
Customs valuation of imported polyurethane-coated polyester water-resistant fabrics must be redetermined under the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007 using comparable contemporary imports rather than an internal departmental instruction or the highest available comparable value. Bills of Entry submitted by the importer should be considered, with the lowest value of similar contemporary imports forming the basis for reassessment. Excess quantity and minor declaration variations may render goods liable to confiscation, even where thickness variations fall within the declared GSM range and no intent to evade duty is established. Redemption fine and penalty must remain proportionate to the importer's involvement and be recalculated by reference to the redetermined value.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.