Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
For arm's length pricing of preform silica imports, the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method applies where reliable internal and external uncontrolled-price data exist for the same raw material. Customs data and internal uncontrolled purchases supported that the associated-enterprise purchase price did not exceed uncontrolled prices. In the absence of changes in the transactions, parties or asset base, a consistently accepted CUP method should not be replaced by the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) without justification. Under TNMM, a diversified manufacturer and service provider without reliable segmental revenue or margin data is not functionally comparable to an entity manufacturing only optical fibre. The CUP-based pricing was accepted, and the TNMM-based transfer-pricing adjustment was deleted.
For arm's length pricing of preform silica imports, the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method applies where reliable internal and external uncontrolled-price data exist for the same raw material. Customs data and internal uncontrolled purchases supported that the associated-enterprise purchase price did not exceed uncontrolled prices. In the absence of changes in the transactions, parties or asset base, a consistently accepted CUP method should not be replaced by the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) without justification. Under TNMM, a diversified manufacturer and service provider without reliable segmental revenue or margin data is not functionally comparable to an entity manufacturing only optical fibre. The CUP-based pricing was accepted, and the TNMM-based transfer-pricing adjustment was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.