Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Condonation of delay permits statutory appeal restoration where inadequate service explanation prevented consideration of reassessment and taxable-inc...
Knowing assistance in handling proceeds of crime falls within money-laundering where a person knowingly participates in processes connected with concealment, possession, acquisition, use or projection of tainted property as untainted. The material described alleged that funds from a scheduled offence were routed through the petitioner and substantially retransferred to personal accounts rather than used for the stated construction purpose, indicating prima facie active participation in transferring, concealing and disbursing such funds. The complaint was therefore not quashed. Parity with a bank Branch Manager was unavailable because the earlier quashing rested on no specific material against that manager, whereas the petitioner was attributed specific acts involving tainted funds.
Knowing assistance in handling proceeds of crime falls within money-laundering where a person knowingly participates in processes connected with concealment, possession, acquisition, use or projection of tainted property as untainted. The material described alleged that funds from a scheduled offence were routed through the petitioner and substantially retransferred to personal accounts rather than used for the stated construction purpose, indicating prima facie active participation in transferring, concealing and disbursing such funds. The complaint was therefore not quashed. Parity with a bank Branch Manager was unavailable because the earlier quashing rested on no specific material against that manager, whereas the petitioner was attributed specific acts involving tainted funds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
