Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Condonation of delay permits statutory appeal restoration where inadequate service explanation prevented consideration of reassessment and taxable-inc...
A bank stock statement cannot alone establish undervaluation of closing stock for tax purposes without independently verified evidence. Where the taxpayer consistently applied its valuation method, reconciled differences from bank figures, and the books showed no defects, deletion of the addition was upheld. Applying the principle of consistency, deletion of interest disallowance on unpaid purchase price was sustained because no distinguishing facts or evidence of related-party payment or unreasonable interest emerged. Deletion of Keyman Insurance Policy premium disallowance was also upheld, as the company was the policy beneficiary and earlier-year treatment was followed. The tax appeal was dismissed for absence of a substantial question of law.
A bank stock statement cannot alone establish undervaluation of closing stock for tax purposes without independently verified evidence. Where the taxpayer consistently applied its valuation method, reconciled differences from bank figures, and the books showed no defects, deletion of the addition was upheld. Applying the principle of consistency, deletion of interest disallowance on unpaid purchase price was sustained because no distinguishing facts or evidence of related-party payment or unreasonable interest emerged. Deletion of Keyman Insurance Policy premium disallowance was also upheld, as the company was the policy beneficiary and earlier-year treatment was followed. The tax appeal was dismissed for absence of a substantial question of law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
