Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Condonation of delay permits statutory appeal restoration where inadequate service explanation prevented consideration of reassessment and taxable-inc...
Liquid crystal display touch-panel modules specifically covered by tariff heading 9013 cannot be classified under heading 8537 as programmable switchboards or controllers merely because of their use in a final product. Applying the Supreme Court's ruling in CCC, Aurangabad v. Videocon Industries, the article notes that the specific LCD heading governs unless the goods are more specifically provided for elsewhere. The classification order was set aside, and the matter was remitted for a fresh classification decision under Chapter 90.
Liquid crystal display touch-panel modules specifically covered by tariff heading 9013 cannot be classified under heading 8537 as programmable switchboards or controllers merely because of their use in a final product. Applying the Supreme Court's ruling in CCC, Aurangabad v. Videocon Industries, the article notes that the specific LCD heading governs unless the goods are more specifically provided for elsewhere. The classification order was set aside, and the matter was remitted for a fresh classification decision under Chapter 90.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.