Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Medical relief is a distinct charitable purpose, so the commerciality test in the proviso to section 2(15) cannot be mechanically applied to a hospital whose object is medical relief; surplus and organised operations do not by themselves make its activities non-charitable, and the rejection of renewal on that basis was unsustainable. Alleged breach of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act and the IPF Scheme could not be independently adjudicated in renewal proceedings without an adverse determination by the competent authority; low bed occupancy or incomplete data did not establish violation. Renewal proceedings also could not be converted into retrospective cancellation from the original grant absent findings of fraud, misrepresentation, concealment, suppression, or void inception, so the cancellation was set aside.
Medical relief is a distinct charitable purpose, so the commerciality test in the proviso to section 2(15) cannot be mechanically applied to a hospital whose object is medical relief; surplus and organised operations do not by themselves make its activities non-charitable, and the rejection of renewal on that basis was unsustainable. Alleged breach of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act and the IPF Scheme could not be independently adjudicated in renewal proceedings without an adverse determination by the competent authority; low bed occupancy or incomplete data did not establish violation. Renewal proceedings also could not be converted into retrospective cancellation from the original grant absent findings of fraud, misrepresentation, concealment, suppression, or void inception, so the cancellation was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.