Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Condonation of delay permits statutory appeal restoration where inadequate service explanation prevented consideration of reassessment and taxable-inc...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Medical relief remains a distinct charitable purpose under section 12AB, and a hospital does not lose that character merely because it operates modern infrastructure, charges differential tariffs, serves paying patients or earns surplus, absent evidence of private enrichment, diversion of income, abandonment of objects, or use of funds for non-charitable purposes. For refusal or cancellation based on compliance with other laws, there must be an established breach determined by the competent authority; the income-tax authority cannot itself adjudicate alleged violations of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act or the IPF Scheme. On that basis, retrospective cancellation and the consequential refusal of related approval were unsustainable.
Medical relief remains a distinct charitable purpose under section 12AB, and a hospital does not lose that character merely because it operates modern infrastructure, charges differential tariffs, serves paying patients or earns surplus, absent evidence of private enrichment, diversion of income, abandonment of objects, or use of funds for non-charitable purposes. For refusal or cancellation based on compliance with other laws, there must be an established breach determined by the competent authority; the income-tax authority cannot itself adjudicate alleged violations of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act or the IPF Scheme. On that basis, retrospective cancellation and the consequential refusal of related approval were unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.