Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 96136 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226(2) was not made out for a writ challenging NCLT, Delhi proceedings initiating personal insolvency against a guarantor. The relevant cause of action arose from proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and Section 60 placed the Adjudicating Authority in the NCLT having jurisdiction over the corporate person's registered office. As that office was in New Delhi, the fact that the credit facility had been availed in Kerala did not confer jurisdiction on the Kerala High Court. The writ petition was dismissed as not maintainable for want of territorial jurisdiction, and the alternate-remedy objection was left unexamined.
Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226(2) was not made out for a writ challenging NCLT, Delhi proceedings initiating personal insolvency against a guarantor. The relevant cause of action arose from proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and Section 60 placed the Adjudicating Authority in the NCLT having jurisdiction over the corporate person's registered office. As that office was in New Delhi, the fact that the credit facility had been availed in Kerala did not confer jurisdiction on the Kerala High Court. The writ petition was dismissed as not maintainable for want of territorial jurisdiction, and the alternate-remedy objection was left unexamined.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
