Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Condonation of delay permits statutory appeal restoration where inadequate service explanation prevented consideration of reassessment and taxable-inc...
In completed assessments under section 153A, additions can be...
Search assessment and multiplex lease receipts: incriminating material limits additions, but commercial exploitation supported business income treatment.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
In completed assessments under section 153A, additions can be made only on the basis of incriminating material having a live nexus with undisclosed income; the seized loose sheet and sub-lease agreement did not meet that test for the unabated years, so the additions for A.Ys. 2013-14 to 2016-17 were deleted. For A.Y. 2017-18, the year was abated, and for A.Y. 2018-19, assessed as the search year, the absence of incriminating material did not bar a fresh assessment, so that jurisdictional objection failed. On merits, receipts from the multiplex lease were treated as business income because the asset was commercially exploited under a structured arrangement, and the receipts had consistently been disclosed on that basis.
In completed assessments under section 153A, additions can be made only on the basis of incriminating material having a live nexus with undisclosed income; the seized loose sheet and sub-lease agreement did not meet that test for the unabated years, so the additions for A.Ys. 2013-14 to 2016-17 were deleted. For A.Y. 2017-18, the year was abated, and for A.Y. 2018-19, assessed as the search year, the absence of incriminating material did not bar a fresh assessment, so that jurisdictional objection failed. On merits, receipts from the multiplex lease were treated as business income because the asset was commercially exploited under a structured arrangement, and the receipts had consistently been disclosed on that basis.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
