Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) could not be sustained where society charges and depreciation were disallowed only for want of supporting evidence or by following earlier years, because the claims were fully disclosed in the books and return and no false or inaccurate particulars were found. In an unabated year, additions under section 153C could not rest on routine disallowances without incriminating material. The Tribunal upheld deletion of the penalty, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) could not be sustained where society charges and depreciation were disallowed only for want of supporting evidence or by following earlier years, because the claims were fully disclosed in the books and return and no false or inaccurate particulars were found. In an unabated year, additions under section 153C could not rest on routine disallowances without incriminating material. The Tribunal upheld deletion of the penalty, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
