Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Liability of Composition tax

Guest

if a dealer opts composition scheme under vat act having sale of Rs 30lacs (including 4% sale Rs 7.50 Lacs And Rs.22.5 lac vat free sale).Is the dealer liable to deposit composition tax 1% at total sale of Rs. 30Lac or On Rs 7.5 lac .

Dealer Questions VAT Composition Tax on Total Sales vs. VAT Sales Only; Liability May Vary by State A dealer under a VAT composition scheme, with total sales of Rs 30 lakhs (including Rs 7.5 lakhs at 4% VAT and Rs 22.5 lakhs VAT-free), inquires about the liability to deposit composition tax. The question is whether the 1% composition tax applies to the entire Rs 30 lakhs or just the Rs 7.5 lakhs subject to VAT. The response indicates that the liability varies depending on the state and specific transaction circumstances. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Surender Gupta on Nov 15, 2008
This issue is different from state to state and circumstances in which transaction is being executed.
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues