Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Clarification - Cenvat Credit

ranganath shenoy

Dear Sirs, 1)Is there a mandate in the cenvat credit rules that in a case where there is both exempted and taxable output services,the apportionmemt of credit has to be done irrespective of the fact that the input service is exclusively used for providing taxable service.2)What is the status of unutilised credit available on 31-03-2008,is old rule applicable or the new rule of apportionment.3)Can vacant land rent be considered as exempted service

Clarification on Cenvat Credit Rules: Rule 6(3) Options, Unutilized Credit Status, Exempted Services, and Record Maintenance Dispute. A query was raised regarding Cenvat Credit rules, specifically about the apportionment of credit when both exempted and taxable services are involved, and the status of unutilized credit as of March 31, 2008. One response clarified that Rule 6 of the CCR requires following options in Rule 6(3) if separate records are not maintained, and unutilized credit may lapse, though this is disputed. Renting of vacant land is considered an exempted service. Another response stated that separate records cannot be selectively maintained for certain input services and that unutilized credit can be carried forward. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Guest on Oct 6, 2008

1. As per the present Rule 6 of CCR, even in the case where the input service is exclusively used for providing output service, options as provided in Rule 6(3) is to be followed in case of non-maintenance of separate records of utilisation 2. Where Rule 6(3) is applicable, it is view of the department that unutilised credit as of 31/03/08 is not eligible for adjustment and will lapse, but i feel this is a disputed issue. 3. As renting of property is defined as service, renting of vacant land (which is not subject to tax) will be treated as exempted service as per the definition of exempted service in CCR, 2004.

Surender Gupta on Oct 9, 2008
There is no provision in Cenvat Credit rules that for certain input services you maintain separate records and for other services you maintain common records. You have to choose either of the option. Further, you are entitled to carry forward the unutilized credit.
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues