Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New Feature Launched βœ•

Introducing the β€œIn Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.

  • βš–οΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
  • πŸ” Narrow down results with higher precision

Try it now in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
β•³
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
βœ•
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query βœ•
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Duty - time barred

Guest

Units working under Sec.58 & 65 of Customs Act, 1962 (Shipbuilding Industry) Availing end use based Cus.Noti. 21/2002 Cust. Warehoused goods, Application for extension of W/P filed belatedly, which is pending with the Chief Commis. warehoused goods already issued/utilized under bond manufacturing activity but the resultant goods is yet under the area of Section 58 of CA. No Customs Duty is payable in terms of Noti.No.21/2002 Cust. Department has raised & Confirmed demand of Customs Duty, interest, penalty. My query: Demand of Customs duty & interestis justified when no duty payable in terms of exemption noti supra. rerer of Apex Court decision in case of Pratibha Processor accepted by the CBEC. Demand issued after Six months, time barring plea applicable for warehose goods. Please provide CITATION of APEX Court and CESTAT (WZB)support the case.

Customs Duty on Warehoused Goods in Shipbuilding: Applicability Under Sections 58 & 65 of Customs Act 1962 Challenged A query was raised regarding the applicability of customs duty, interest, and penalties on warehoused goods under Sections 58 and 65 of the Customs Act, 1962, specifically for the shipbuilding industry availing exemption under Notification No. 21/2002. The goods were utilized for manufacturing but remained under Section 58. The customs department confirmed a demand, despite the exemption. The query questioned the justification of the demand, referencing a Supreme Court decision in the Pratibha Processor case and a time-barring plea. The response advised consulting a professional for further guidance. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Surender Gupta on Apr 9, 2008
You need to contact the consultant.
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues