Material clear against Status Holder Incentive Scrip

[SNEHAL SHAH]

R/sir ,

We are Enginnering Manufacturing company and we have supply goods to Party ( Holder of  Status Holder Incentive scrip )  without payment of duty vide Notification No. 33 / 2012 - Central Excise dtd 9th July 2012 .

Party submit copy of Licence ( Status Holder Incentive scrip) and details of duty debit against Proforma Invoice which was issued by us & also sign and signatory by Superintendent of Custom .

Now party insist that we have also require sign and stamp of Superitendent of range officer of our company ( Engineering company) on this debit script ( Duty debited ).

Please guide to us in this issue , is it require or not ?

Awaited your valuable reply .

With Regards,

SNEHAL SHAH

[YAGAY andSUN]

[PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, EXTRAORDINARY, PART II,

SECTION 3, SUB-SECTION (i)]

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

(DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE)

Notification No. 33 / 2012 - Central Excise

 

[SNEHAL SHAH]

R/sir,

First thanks for reply .

I have already this Notification copy , but confusion is that is there any mandatory requirement of Excise superitendent for Sign and signatory on script .

With Regards,

SNEHAL SHAH

[YAGAY andSUN]

Please read the para 7 (g) and 7 (h) in this regard.

AI Summary

Engineering firm questions need for extra endorsement on duty-free goods under Notification No. 33/2012-Central Excise. An engineering manufacturing company supplied goods to a party holding a Status Holder Incentive Scrip without paying duty, as per Notification No. 33/2012 - Central Excise. The party provided a copy of the scrip and duty debit details, signed by a Customs Superintendent. However, the party requested an additional signature and stamp from the company's range officer. The company seeks clarification on whether this additional endorsement is mandatory. A respondent advised reviewing specific paragraphs of the notification for guidance on the requirement of an Excise Superintendent's signature.