Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

valuation on stock transfer Rule 8 of valuation rule

onkar kumar

Dear Member Can any body tell me whether the decision in case of M/s Ispat Industries ltd. Vrs. CCE, Raigad 2007(209) ELT 185 (Tri-LB) has been overruled by any court?  In this case the tribunal held that when there is stock transfer for captive consumption as well as sell to independent buyer, Rule 8 of valuation rule will not be applicable for stock transfer case and goods will be valued under sectin 4(1)(a) i.e. transaction value. Thank You

Debate on Rule 8 Valuation: Captive Consumption vs. Independent Sales; Ispat Industries Case Still Valid A forum discussion revolves around the applicability of Rule 8 of the valuation rules concerning stock transfers for captive consumption versus sales to independent buyers. A participant queries whether the decision in a specific tribunal case involving Ispat Industries has been overruled. The discussion highlights differing interpretations of valuation rules, specifically whether Rule 8 applies when goods are partly transferred for captive consumption and partly sold to independent buyers. It is noted that the tribunal's decision has not been overruled and is supported by subsequent cases, suggesting Rule 8 applies only when goods are exclusively transferred to own units. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues