Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Confirmation by Supplier

Siraj Shaikh

I purchased some goods from a suuplier of Rs. 344551 (TAX rate 5%) in the year 2004-05 and made the payment by cheque. During the VAT assessment, Our Sales Tax Officer has received the confirmation from my supplier of Rs. 103,365. The STO is asking for the confimation of 100% amount or else he will raise the demand on us for the balance VAT.

We made several follow up with the Supplier to give the confirmation of the 100% payment.

We have got all the invoices and bank statement to prove that the payment has been made to the supplier.

Still,our consultant advised us the the STO is authorised to raise the demand on us for the differential amount.

Can someone throw some lights on the clairty of the law ????

Purchaser Faces VAT Demand Over Unconfirmed Transaction; Consultant Recommends Reviewing MVAT Act and Supplier Cooperation A purchaser raised a query regarding a VAT issue where a supplier confirmed only part of a transaction amount, leading the Sales Tax Officer (STO) to demand confirmation of the full amount or face a VAT demand. Despite having invoices and bank statements, the purchaser's consultant advised that the STO could still raise a demand for the differential amount. A respondent suggested that if VAT has been paid, the MVAT Department should not tax unconfirmed purchases. The respondent also advised consulting the relevant MVAT Act sections and ensuring supplier cooperation to resolve the issue. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
YAGAY andSUN on Aug 7, 2012

Once you have paid the tax on your purchase then nothing left to the MVAT Department to tax on purchases which had not been confirmed by your supplier in terms of receipt of payment against these purchases.  It seems that MVAT Department is acting on suspicion.

In this scenario, please ask you supplier to co-operate with you to get rid of any unwanted situation.

Further, as per Geru Lal judgment ( P&H ), if you had paid VAT on your purchases and your supplier don't deposit the tax to the Government, even then, bonafide dealer can't be restricted to avail the ITC.

 

YAGAY andSUN on Aug 7, 2012

Please discuss with your consultant that which Section or Rule the STO is empowered to raise the demand on you under abovementioned sceanario whether it is under best judgment assessment.

Please get the clarification and share it with me to further discussions.

YAGAY andSUN on Aug 7, 2012

Please go throuhg the Section 23 of the MVAT Act on the aforesaid matter.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues