Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Reversal of Service tax credit on sale of raw material

Harishanker Patel

Whether service tax credit taken on GTA, Chargo handling & Business auxiliary service for procuring the Iron ore (raw material for sponge iron manufactrer) is required to reverse on sale of of some Iron Ore.

Debate on Reversal of Service Tax Credit for Iron Ore under Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rule, 2004. A discussion on whether service tax credit on services like GTA, cargo handling, and business auxiliary services for procuring iron ore needs to be reversed upon selling the ore. One party argues that Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rule, 2004 requires reversal if iron ore is sold, but not if iron ore fines are generated during manufacturing. Others cite various CESTAT rulings stating that input services do not require reversal upon removal, as services cannot be stored or removed 'as such.' The issue is contentious due to differing interpretations and audit objections. Participants seek clarification on whether the activity constitutes trading or clearance. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues