Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act 1961

NIRMAL Kashyap

ITO has issued order  impossing penalty u/s 271(1)(c)on 28/3/2012  taking prior approval of the Range Addl. Comm. of Income Tax due to non compliance of Show Cause notice issued  on 17/01/12 & 7/2/12.But I replied against the notice on 19/03/2012.Pls suggest how could I proceed in this case.

Appeal Suggested Against Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act for Alleged Non-Compliance with Notices A query was raised regarding a penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to alleged non-compliance with show cause notices. The penalty order was issued on March 28, 2012, despite a response being submitted on March 19, 2012. The suggested course of action is to file an appeal within the stipulated period. If there is proof of the response submission, the appeal could request a remand for a fresh hearing. Without such proof, the appeal should aim to set aside the penalty order. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues