Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Capital Gain

Reshma kochar

Dear Experts,

Please share your views in case of Capital Gain whether date of booking or date of possession is taken as date of acquisition??

Please refer some latest case laws too.

Regards,

Reshma

Debate Over Capital Gains Tax: Is Acquisition Date Based on Booking or Possession? Expert Insights and Case Law Sought. A discussion on a forum revolves around the determination of the date of acquisition for capital gains tax purposes, questioning whether it should be the date of booking or possession. An individual queries experts for insights and case law references. An expert responds, stating that possession marks the completion of acquisition, while booking grants contractual rights. The query continues with a reference to a Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment suggesting booking as the acquisition date. The expert requests the full citation, suggesting the judgment might be context-specific, and maintains that possession should be the acquisition date for capital gains purposes. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues